A big thanks to Carl Smith for his many kind words, and for asking me to be interviewed.
I recently launched a new blog, These go to five, which is attempting to (very slowly) chronicle all of the five-star songs that make up my iTunes music library. These songs represent only about 1% of my ~13,000 song music collection, so I thought I would use the blog to explain why they are so special to me.
Once I had settled on the name — a bit of an oblique reference to these go to eleven — I then started work on my design for a banner logo. The following video shows how I iterated over several designs before arriving at the final version. The backing music is an instrumental song that I wrote as part of the RPM music challenge.
Time for some amateur psephology regarding the imminent UK general election. British voters have probably seen many, many graphs like this one which shows the projected share of the vote:
However, these type of graphs don't always reflect the picture among the entire electorate. That's because a sizable chunk of eligible voters do not vote. In the previous 2010 election, voter turnout was 65.1% and this is pretty close to the average from the last four elections (average turnout 64.1%). So let's assume that turnout on Thursday will be about the same, and I'll arbitrarily set it at 65%. This means that the 34.5% of people who are projected to vote Conservative are really drawn from the 65% of people who might actually vote. I.e. the percentage of the electorate who might vote Conservative is only 22.4%. So the most popular party — in terms of share of the vote — may only have the backing of fewer than 1-in-4 possible voters. Let's see how things look if we plot the support for each party based on the percentage of the electorate who might vote for them:
Of course, it's possible that the third or so of people who don't vote may all have strong leanings towards the Conservatives, or towards Labour, or it may be that the 35% contains a representative mix of supporters of all of the parties. I'm not sure if anyone has any good insight into political allegiances of this group of non-voters.
There is already a lot of speculation as to which coalition might end up coming together to form a workable government (there are a lot of permutations). So I'm curious about how well possible coalitions might reflect support from the electorate as a whole vs the combined number of seats they would amass as a voting block. To gain an absolute majority, any coalition would ideally need 325 of the 650 seats.
The following graph plots the number of seats that various Conservative and Labour coalitions might achieve vs the possible percentage of the electorate that might back such a coalition. I've also included separate data points for Conservative and Labour as potential minority governments (circles and squares indicate Conservative/Labour coalitions respectively):
So what does all of this mean? First let's look at the situation for the Conservatives:
- Another Conservative/Liberal Democrats coalition would have 307 combined seats, but would only have the backing of 30% of the electorate.
- Combining with the UK Independence Party (UKIP) might only give the Conservatives 1 more seat, but it adds a sizable chunk of electoral support (rising from 22.4% to 29.6%)
- If the Conservative could combine with the Lib Dems, UKIP, and the Democratic Unionists Party — a party from Northern Island who have often allied with the Conservatives in the past — then they would still only have 316 seats, and this would reflect potential backing of 37.6% of the electorate.
- It's hard to imagine any other party supporting the Conservatives, except for maybe on a vote-by-vote basis.
And for Labour:
- Support from the Scottish National Party (SNP) would add a huge number of seats to a potential coalition (which has already been ruled out), but would hardly change the national backing from the electorate. The SNP only run candidates in Scotland and despite potentially winning almost every Scottish seat, this may only reflect 2.5% of the electorate voting for them.
- In contrast, a Labour/Lib Dems coalition would gain fewer seats than a Labour/SNP deal (293 vs 318) but would end up reflecting much more support from the electorate.
- Labour have more potential coalition partners than the Conservatives, and could possibly form some sort of union with the SNP — yes, I know that I've already said that this has been ruled out but you know…politics — as well as the Lib Dems, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, and the SDLP (the Social Democratic Labour Party of Northern Ireland). If they all joined forces, they could amass 352 seats with backing from 34.7% of the electorate.
So in the unlikely scenario of grand Conservative or Labour coalitions, you still end up with a situation where less than 40% of the electorate would have voted for them. Only if Labour can unite with the SNP, will they have a chance of an absolute majority (>325 seats). The best they can do otherwise might be about 300 seats or so.
I find it interesting that the slice of the electorate who probably won't vote is larger than any single party, and larger than all of the potential coalitions listed above bar one (the grand Conservative coalition).
Whatever happens on Thursday — and over the following days and weeks — it will probably be true that any resulting coalition is going to be unpopular with most of the electorate.
A few months ago I received an email inviting me to give a talk at a company that will remain anonymous — let's just say that it is a Bay Area company that has an interest in genomics (so that narrows it down to a few hundred or so).
I will stress that the original email simply asked, in very general terms, if I would be interested in visiting to give a talk. There was some back-and-forth email as we tried confirming a date and one email clarified that I could give a talk, have lunch, and then "perhaps" have some one-on-one meetings.
After we confirmed the date, I received an email that included my itinerary for the day. A few alarm bells rang when I saw that the file attachment was named 'Interview schedule'. In addition to giving a talk and having lunch I was now scheduled to have seven separate interviews with people at the company.
At this point I noticed from their company's website that they were actively recruiting, but I double checked all of our earlier email communications and confirmed that at no point had any employment opportunities been mentioned. So maybe 'interviews' was their name for informal one-on-ones?
Then a few days ago I received another confusing email that asked me to sign the company's NDA and complete the the employment application form. Hmm, it was decidedly looking like they were under the impression that I was being interviewed for a job. Not wanting to waste anyone's time I clarified that I thought I was just giving a talk. This no doubt has caused an equal measure of confusion at their end, and they swiftly suggested we cancel the whole thing.
So I'm no longer giving a talk this week, though as I have made many new slides I may well put the talk online anyway. It still kind of amazes me that this company could get so far along the recruitment process without realizing that the person that they wanted to interview hadn't actually applied for anything.
There is a relatively new Japanese restaurant in Davis. Like all restaurants, and most places of business, it has signage that displays the name of the restaurant. Here is how that sign looks when looking at it directly from about 20 feet away:
If you were driving past this establishment, you'd be another 20 feet or so away from the sign. I suspect that many of you might not be able to clearly read the first word. Here's a close up:
The shadows that you can see hint at the problem that I'm about to raise. This signage is 3-dimensional, with the letters being raised several inches from the wall. So what happens when you have such a sign and you try looking at it from anything other than directly head on?
Doesn't seem great from a marketing perspective if the name of your business can only be read when looking at your sign from one particular angle! It's a little better at night as the white backing to the letters is illuminated. Here is a close up that more clearly shows the 3-dimensional nature of the sign:
Did no-one check this at any point and ask the simple question "Wait, can you actually read those words?"
There really is an awful lot of pointless rubbish on change.org. So I was curious whether they would let me create a petition calling for change to change.org. Specifically, to stop all of these pointless petitions from being added in the first place.
The fact that they allowed me to create such a petition perfectly illustrate my case regarding a need for some sort of curation. My petition is now live:
Join with me and together we can rule the Galaxy as father and son…er, I mean we can make a difference. In the immortal words of Mr. David Robert Jones: "Time to make a change".
This weekend we managed to catch the Sketches of Science exhibition at the Mondavi Center (also see the official website). I thoroughly recommend that people catch this free exhibition before it finishes on 28th January.
Photographer Volker Steger has met with many Nobel prize winners and asked them to make a poster (using crayons) that represents their nobel-prize-winning science. He then photographs them with their poster and some of the posters are also accompanied by audio interviews.
There is a lot of humor, beauty, and fun that emerges from this experience. Some scientists go for a simple representation of their work, others pack a lot into the poster (including a poem in one instance). Well worth seeing if you get a chance. I believe that this is the only place in the USA where this exhibit is being shown at the moment.
This Saturday marked by 10th year at UC Davis (also my 10th year of living in the USA). This is kind of incredible since the plan was only ever to stay for a year or two! Since arriving here in 2005, I have become a husband, a father, and settled down to a wonderful family life.
However, all good things come to an end and so we are planning to move back across the pond. We don't yet know where we will go (probably the UK, but possibly Western Europe), we don't know yet know what we we will do (probably something related to science), and we don't yet know when we will go (probably early 2016).
The USA, and Davis in particuar, has been very good to us both professionally and personally. Our careers have flourished, but more importantly we have made some wonderful friends who we expect to keep in close contact with wherever we end up.
I thought that this would be a fitting time to relaunch my website and blog as I plan to write more regarding what will be the next big chapter in our lives. The idea of not knowing where you will be in a year's time, or what you will be doing, is exciting and scary in equal measure.
I'm looking forward to what the future brings us.
I've decided that as I'm increasingly using this blog to write about science-related topics (bioinformatics in particular), that they should have a new home. Therefore, all of my existing genomics and bioinformatics blog posts have been copied to my new ACGT blog:
I have also removed these posts from this site so that (ultimately) they will only show up in one place in search engine results. Going forward, I will use the ACGT blog to write about anything that is predominantly science related. In contrast, this blog will now be used almost exclusively for stuff that is not primarily related to my research work.
Updated 2015-11-12 to reflect that I have now removed the posts that were duplicated between this blog and ACGT.
One reason why I've been watching this video over and over again is because Joe has shot some superb scenes with amazing lighting, and it is just beautiful to watch. However, that's not the only reason why I'm so drawn to this video.
After nine years of working at UC Davis I realized just how connected I feel to many of the places that are included in this video. For most of the last two years I have abandoned cycling in favor of walking everywhere on campus. I'm based on the 'far side' of campus near Aggie Stadium, but frequent meetings, teaching requirements, and the need to get a bus home, all mean that I'm regularly walking all over campus.
When I first saw this video, I instantly recognized every location because in an average week, I walk past (or through) most of them! So here is my shot-by-shot breakdown of the video (with links to DavisWiki as appropriate):
- 0:00–0:05 MU bus terminal
- 0:06–0:09 The western edge of the Quad, facing south
- 0:10–0:16 On the Quad, facing the MU
- 0:17–0:25 On top of the West Entry Parking Structure on Hutchinson Drive, looking southwest to the GBSF and the Health Sciences District
- 0:26–0:30 In the Arboretum by Lake Spafford, looking west
- 031–0:34 Looking west across Lake Spafford
- 0:35–0:38 Looking at 3rd & U Cafe from 3rd & University
- 0:39–0:42 Looking at Wellman Hall from the east side
- 0:43–0:47 Entrance of Warren & Leta Giedt Hall, with Kemper Hall in background
- 0:48–0:57 Two scenes inside the CoHo
- 0:58–1:02 Moving to outside the CoHo, overlooking the Quad
- 1:03–1:09 Back to the MU bus terminal, looking north
- 1:10–1:15 Outside the Mondavi Center
- 1:16–1:19 Central area of Olson Hall looking down to the basement
- 1:20–1:23 Outside The Silo
- 1:24–1:28 Inside The Silo
- 1:29–1:33 Outside Wellman Hall, looking south to Hart Hall
- 1:34–1:40 Back to the Arboretum
- 1:41–1:46 Aggie Stadium
- 1:47–1:52 The Pavilion
- 1:53–2:02 Soccer field
- 2:03–2:06 Dobbins Baseball field
- 2:07–2:11 My favorite shot...looking up from within the Death Star complex
- 2:12–2:20 Back to the Arboretum
- 2:21–2:23 Looking at the entrance to Hart Hall from corner of Shields Library
- 2:24–2:27 Looking at northern entrance to Mrak Hall
- 2:28–2:32 Dutton Hall
- 2:33–2:36 I think this is on East Field, behind Dutton Hall
- 2:37–2:40 The ARC
- 2:41–2:44 Looking at Peter A. Rock Hall from across the turning circle at Hutchinson Drive & California Avenue
- 2:45–2:48 Hmm, somewhere west of campus? Update: now confirmed to be Hopkins Road (thanks to @brendawrites)
- 2:49–2:53 Not sure...possibly the Teaching Vineyard next to the Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Sciences
Thanks again to Joe for making a beautiful video which serves as a wonderful advertisment for UC Davis.
I thought I would group together links to my set of six posts about how I have migrated from Gmail to FastMail:
- In part 1, I explained the complexity of my email setup.
- I used part 2 to talk about why I wanted to migrate away from the (admittedly very good) tools provided by Google
- Part 3 went over the steps I took to prepare for the migration
- Part 4 proceeded to talk about how you can copy email from Gmail to FastMail and also included some links to some other useful resources online
- In part 5, I covered some of the specific issues that arose duing the migration (e.g. DNS configuration)
- Finally, I used part 6 to list the good and bad things that I have experienced during (and since) this migration
Okay, so I have been negligent in finishing my series of blog posts about my Gmail to FastMail migration. But that negligence ends today.
This is my final post in this series. First, I will list the things I don’t like about FastMail and discuss the problems that I’ve had during my migration from Gmail. Then I’ll cover the things I like about FastMail.
Bad things about FastMail
The list of problems that I have experienced is almost non-existent, and the few issues I have had were my own fault! At one point in my migration, I had my Apple Mail app (on OS X) set up with both my Gmail and my new FastMail account. This meant that I effectively had duplicates of everything.
When I was trying to, ahem, ‘tidy up’ my soon-to-be-defunct Gmail account and check that everything had migrated over to FastMail properly, I accidentally deleted my Gmail ‘Spam’ folder. Only it turned out that this was actually my FastMail Spam folder.
It took me a while to troubleshoot this, but only because a lot of FastMail’s online documentation specifically refers to a folder called ‘Junk Mail’ and not ‘Spam’. E.g. (click to enlarge)
When I later noticed that I was unable to mark mail as junk on the FastMail website, I realized that I had maybe deleted the wrong folder. A quick email to FastMail confirmed that in their new web interface, they have renamed ‘Junk Mail’ to ‘Spam’. Their support team quickly rebuilt my Spam email folder and all was well again.
So that’s my sole criticism of FastMail: because of an error that was my fault I was temporarily confused by some of their documentation which is not up to date. I can live with this!
Good things about FastMail
It works just as you want a mail service to work. Stable, reliable, and powerful.
If you use a custom domain (as is the case for me), they set up a default subdomain at mail.yourcustomdomainname.com that lets you check your mail . I found this was a nice little touch.
The Desktop web app is good. Really good. Supports all of your Gmail keyboard shortcuts and many more besides.
The mobile web app is also fantastic, and supports many great ‘slide’ gestures that makes it feel like a native iOS app. E.g. (click to enlarge):
There is a great set of default settings (click to enlarge):
But when you need them, their Advanced settings are there and they could probably keep you occupied for several days (every option in the left-sidebar opens a whole page of preferences). Click to enlarge:
Fantastic, and timely, support from real people!
Integration with 3rd party mail clients is straightforward and seems to work as expected.
The web app has four main components: Mail, Address Book (I easily imported my addresses from OS X Contacts app), Notes (a simple way of collecting some thoughts in the style of Simplenote , and Files.
Native or web app?
I’m really impressed by the web app experience when using FastMail. So much so, that I’m currently switching a lot between the web apps (on my Mac and on iOS) and 3rd party mail clients. FastMail is working beautifully with Apple’s mail apps (on OS X and iOS) as well as apps like the fantastic AirMail (OS X) and Triage (iOS).
I’m loving FastMail, and still discovering many new things about it every day. I’ve no regrets about migrating away from Gmail and am happy to pay a fair price for this level of quality, functionality, and service.
Today a post on twitter drew my attention to Bioinfo-Bloggers, a site that aggregates content — i.e. the full blog post is reproduced — from 28 different bloggers who write about bioinformatics and genomics.
Outwardly, this might seem like a good idea. The bloggers get more exposure to their material, and readers can visit just one site instead of 28 separate RSS feeds. However, there are several reasons why I have issues with this type of aggregation. Many of my concerns apply even when individual bloggers have expressly licensed their material for reuse (e.g. by use of a CC0 Creative Commons license).
- The site lists the 28 blogs as 'contributors' and lists the blog writers as 'authors'. This strongly suggests that the people in question have consented to their material being used, even when this is not the case.
- Links to the original blog posts are included, but only at the end of each reproduced entry. The included text says that 'This is a syndicated post', further suggesting that the original authors agreed to have their content syndicated.
- The Bioinfo-Bloggers website asserts copyright over all material (see footer section of website).
- The original bloggers lose web traffic. This can matter for minor reasons such as when you want to include details of how popular your blog is for outreach sections on research grants. But it potentially — depending on how much traffic Bioinfo-bloggers gets — deprives you of knowing who is looking at your content, which articles are more popular, etc.
- People don't a chance to comment on your blog (unless they follow the links). You may lose some direct engagement with your readers.
- If people start using this site rather than viewing your blog, what happens if Bioinfo-Bloggers stops including your blog site, or shuts down altogether? In the former case, people might just assume you are not posting any more.
- What happens if Bioinfo-Bloggers starts including content from other blogs that you don't approve of? Your blog post may appear alongside another which espouses views you find offensive.
The first three points could easily be addressed by removing the claim of copyright over all material, by making it explicit that this site is just scraping other sites and that the original bloggers may not be aware of this, and by placing links to the original blog content at the top (not bottom) of each article.
There are currently some ongoing discussions about this on Twitter. E.g.
.@kbradnam *shrug* coming from open source, you sort of get used to stuff being used however. Relevance > details for me. YMMV!— Titus Brown (@ctitusbrown) November 5, 2013
Today I cooked a three course meal with every dish featuring bacon. This was a special treat for some dear friends of ours who will sadly be leaving Davis after many years here. One friend has always made it clear to us that she loves bacon, so I thought I would cook her a meal to remember.
The appetizer — for which I stupidly forgot to take a picture of — was Bacon Cheddar Deviled Eggs. The bacon was cooked on top of a wire rack in the oven (to try to reduce the fat content a little bit). I used an English mustard (Colman's) which has quite a tang. Eggs were served with a few cherry tomatoes on the side that were drizzled in olive oil and served with a large drop of a local Black Currant Balsamic Vinegar.
Accompanying the meat loaf was some mashed potatoes (which included some of the bacon fat, plus a couple of handfuls of crushed cooked bacon) and a green bean and garlic recipe that we love (you add fresh lemon zest right at the end).
For dessert, we did not attempt to shy away from bacon. I made some beer-candied bacon (using the same stout that went into the meat loaf) which was served on some vanilla bean ice-cream with a little bit of dark chocolate with sea salt.
I have never cooked so much bacon in my life! I guess I could have gone the extra step and also prepared a bacon martini but maybe that would have been too much?
As a brief interlude to my never ending series of blog posts about migrating from Gmail to FastMail, I'll quickly note that:
a) Gmail has some problems when used as an account in the Mail app of Mac OS 10.9 (Mavericks)
b) FastMail also has some issues when being used with Mail on Mavericks (these would seem to be due to changes Apple made)
So on the one hand, the former news might encourage more people to move away from Gmail but the latter news item means that Apple's Mail app needs some fixes before being ready to work with FastMail under 10.9 (of course, web access to FastMail is unaffected). This is making me consider waiting a little while before upgrading to 10.9.
Update: 31st October
Turns out the 2nd item above was not FastMail's fault and was an issue with a particular user.
Update: 4th November
Marco Arment's piece on the wider issue of Gmail not adopting standard IMAP protocols is well worth a read.
In this part, I will discuss the changes that I had to make to get FastMail working with my own personal domain.
When I was only using Gmail, I used a personal domain name that I had purchased from the excellent Hover domain name registrar. For just $5 a year, Hover will forward email from a personal email address (using your own domain) to another email account. If I borrow from the fictional example in part 1 of this series, let’s assume I own the domain name mos-eisley-cantina.com and I was previously using Hover to forward mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to my Gmail address (email@example.com). How does this happen with FastMail?
One of the reasons I chose FastMail was that I knew that they supported personal domains. You still get your own FastMail email address as well (and this becomes your account name) but I don't intend to ever use this as an email address.
On following FastMail’s guide to setting up your own domain name I was surprised to find that I had to alter my Hover name server settings for the mos-eisley-cantina.com domain name. I.e. I had to configure Hover to redirect all traffic heading towards mos-eisley-cantina.com to instead go to FastMail’s servers.
I thought I would just be configuring the mail settings at Hover.com rather than redirecting all traffic to FastMail. One of my concerns about this was that I was also using Hover to forward web traffic from mos-eisley-cantina.com to another domain that I own (er…let’s call it wretchedhiveofscumandvillainry.com). As soon as I changed the name server settings in Hover, this forwarding was broken.
I needn’t have worried. Turns out that FastMail provides a lot of options for custom DNS configuration. By visiting Settings->Advanced->Websites/Redirects I could configure my web traffic to be redirected just as before:
So I now have FastMail set up to use my custom domain, though when I set up mail clients such as Apple’s Mail app, I need to use my underlying FastMail email address in the 'User Name' field. To make my custom domain name the default email account, you need to place it first in a comma separated list of email addresses in Apple Mail’s ‘Email address’ field:
- If you want to give me some Hover referral love, please use this link when signing up for a domain (I will get $5 in credit) ↩
- Though you have to sign up for the more expensive enhanced plan to have this feature. On the flip side, I’m no longer paying Hover $5 a year for the email forwarding. ↩
- FastMail provides many different options for your account email address with maybe 50 different domain name extensions (e.g. allmail.net, fastemail.us, myfastmail.com). I went for the default firstname.lastname@example.org format. ↩
I’m falling behind on my (seemingly never-ending) series of posts about migrating from Gmail to FastMail. I still have lots that I want to write about, but for this post I’ll point you towards some resources I found helpful, and will briefly discuss FastMail’s IMAP migration tool.
FastMail provides a lot of really detailed and useful help online. They appreciate that many of you will want to work with FastMail on specific desktop and mobile clients and have created different help pages to address these scenarios. E.g. here is the advice on configuring Apple’s Mail app to work with FastMail folders. Their support team are also very quick to deal with emailed requests.
Here are some guides for migration of Gmail to FastMail:
- The official FastMail migration guide
- A migration guide by readwrite.com (March 2012)
- A short migration overview by Jackson Egan (June 2012)
- An excellent step-by-step guide from Max Masnick (July 2013)
FastMail’s IMAP migration tool
If you decide that you like the free trial of FastMail and want to move to using it 100%, then you will want to bring all of your Gmail (or other email) with you. FastMail has an IMAP migration tool which worked well for me. After logging in to FastMail, navigate to your Account page and select Migrate IMAP under the ‘Maintenance’ settings.
After entering your Gmail credentials, you just let this tool run in the background. It took about 4 hours to copy all of my ~15,000 emails . The best part of this is that it sends you a detailed report when it finishes.
As I mentioned in an earlier post in this series, I was initially confused because my Gmail ‘All Mail’ folder seemed to shrink by several thousand emails. But this is because Gmail — which does many non-standard things with email —counts all sent emails as part of ‘All Mail’. FastMail resolves these into separate folders.
The only hitch in this process was due to my own stupidity. I use SaneBox to pre-filter my Gmail and I needed to tell SaneBox to work with FastMail instead. Foolishly, I did this while my mail was still being imported in the background. This may or may not have been the reason why I ended up with two sets of my SaneBox folders under FastMail. This was easy to resolve though .
In my next post, I’ll talk about how I migrated my personal domain settings over to FastMail.
It leaves all the original emails in Gmail, so there is no real risk of using this tool. ↩
SaneBox gives folders a prefix to make sure that they appear at the top of your list of folders. On Gmail it uses the ‘@’ symbol, but it turns out that different providers sort email folders differently. On FastMail, these folders use a ‘+’ sign (e.g. +SaneLater). During my email migration from Gmail, I also ended up with underscores being used. This gave me a +SaneLater and a _SaneLater folder. I simply moved the contents of _SaneLater into +SaneLater, deleted the former and everything was okay from that point. But really, don’t migrate SaneBox to FastMail until you have finished the Gmail->FastMail migration! ↩
About 7:00 this morning I was somewhat relieved because my scheduled lab talk had been postponed (my boss was not around). But we were still having the lab meeting anyway.
About 8:00 this morning, I stumbled across this blog post by @biomickwatson on twitter. I really enjoyed the post and thought I would mention in in the lab meeting. Suddently though that prompted me to think about some other topics relating to Mick's blog post.
Before I knew it, I had made about 30 slides and ended up speaking for most of the lab meeting. I thought I'd add some notes and post the talk on SlideShare.
I get very frustrated by people who rely heavily on GO term analysis, without having a good understanding of what Gene Ontology terms are, or how they get assigned to database objects. There are too many published anayses which see an enrichment of a particular GO term as some reliable indicator that there is a difference in datasets X & Y. Do they ever check to see how these GO terms were assigned? No.
As part of my recent migration from Gmail to FastMail, I’ve been going through my Gmail Spam folder to check for any non-spam emails that were mistakenly filtered away. In doing so I noticed the following set of emails:
Here is an example of what one of these emails looks like:
These emails are all slightly different, but follow a very similar format:
- All but one comes from — what I imagine to be real — Yahoo! accounts, that have probably been hacked.
- They all ask me to reply to a variety of Russian-based email addresses.
- They all use a series of similar phrases to try to engage with me
It is the last point that amuses me. The ‘little girlie’ who sent these emails uses the following variations to tempt me to reply to her:
“I love your page”
“I enjoy your user profile”
“I like your user profile”
“I like your page”
“I enjoy your profile”
“I love your profile”
And it almost worked. I was just about ready to reply — and hand over my credit card information for good measure — when I noticed this email:
“Most”?!? You only enjoyed most of my user profile? If you are trying to tempt me (and scam me in the process), you’d better work on your flattery skills.
I promise that I will get around to explaining the gory details of my Gmail to FastMail migration (and also how I’m finding FastMail as a service), but one final post before then. This time I want to talk about ‘preparation’.
If you are thinking of taking FastMail for a test drive, you can of course do this as a 60 day free trial (no credit card needed as well). If you do this, then you don’t need to do much preparation other than set Gmail to forward your email (and keep a copy in the inbox or Archive folder):
Something else to bear in mind is that Gmail applies spam filtering rules before email gets forwarded. I’ve had issues where Gmail routinely flags some emails as spam (even though I’ve set up filters to tell it not to). This is where I’ve found the SaneNotSpam tool by SaneBox to be really useful.
Michael Crusoe gave me a useful tip on twitter about this. Simply make a filtering rule in Gmail to forward all spam email. I did something slightly different and made a rule to not move any email to the Spam folder.
If you set up forwarding like this then you can continue using Gmail as before, but everything will also end up in FastMail. To be able to send from your Gmail address within FastMail, you’ll need to set up a Gmail personality. FastMail also allows aliases, but these differ somewhat from personalities.
Go on a Gmail diet
My final preparation tip — for those who are considering a permanent migration to FastMail — would be to slim down your Gmail archive. The much-touted advantage of never needing to delete emails when using Gmail is great…except for when you want to switch providers.
Although FastMail has a decent IMAP migration tool, it can take many hours to migrate thousands of emails (and I’m assuming that most Gmail users have thousands, if not tens of thousands, of emails). When I first started thinking about leaving Gmail (over a year ago now), I realized that I should probably start slimming down my Gmail archive.
It wasn’t until I completed the migration to FastMail that I realized that Gmail’s Archive folder also contains all of your sent mail. Initially I thought that the FastMail migration tool had made an error because I was missing about 6,000 emails. Turns out these were all of my sent messages, which FastMail — like other email providers — only keeps in the Sent messages folder.
In part 4 I will explain a bit more about how the actual migration went for me, and what other things I needed to do in order to use my custom domain with FastMail.
I wish more services would let you try them without having to hand over credit card details ↩
In particular, emails from Amazon often end up in my Gmail spam folder. ↩
Though this is only catching spam email that is directly addressed to me. I’m still seeing some spam email where I’m presumably bcc recipient. But I can live with this. ↩
I now have a personality in FastMail for each account that I want to be able to send email from. ↩
Over the course of the last year, I’ve shed about 3,000 emails from my archive. This might seem like a lot, but my starting point was about 18,000 emails so I’m not sure how much time this saved me during the actual migration. ↩